Famous food products of pets remembered over the threat of bird poultry

Cat owners have been warned of a potential health threat.

Savage Pet I El Cajon, California, is recalling 66 large chicken boxes (84 oz.) And 74 small chicken boxes (21 oz.) With the lottery code/”BEST according to” 11.15.2026, as these products have “the potential to contain H5N1, also known as the Grip of the Birds”, according

Savage Cat food products were distributed to retail sellers in five countries: California, Colorado, New York, Pennsylvania and Washington, the FDA website says.

“The people who fed [their] Cats drawn products should look for symptoms of bird flu, including fever, lethargy, low appetite, reddish or inflamed eyes, eye and nose discharges, difficulty breathing and neurological signs such as tremor, solid body movements, seizure, lack of coordination or blindness, “the announcement says.

Anyone whose lines display these signs after consuming the product “should contact their veterinarian immediately,” FDA advises.

FDA shows that “While no human infections have been identified among people who treat raw food products of pets, people can become infected if [the] The living virus is inserted into a person’s eyes, nose or mouth. “

Regular hand washing and cleaning of contact surfaces is highly recommended, the announcement also indicates.

“People who have treated drawn products should look for symptoms of bird flu, including redness or irritation (conjunctivitis), cough, sore throat, sneezing, fluent/nasal nose, body aches/body aches, headaches, fatigue, fatigue, fever, fever, vomitations. “

The announcement also says, “People who display these signs after contacting this product should contact their healthcare provider and local health department.”

In February, Savage Pet said he was “made aware of a cat in Colorado that contracted H5N1, became ill and healed.”

Laboratory at Colorado State University “tested stamped packages of cat food using PCR testing for H5N1,” says the FDA site.

The PCR test results were “non-negative”, according to the same source.

The “non-negative” PCR “product product was sent to the National Veterinary Services Laboratory in AMES, Iowa, for testing the virus insulation”-and the product was taken from the market pending the final test results, says the site.

Testing of the virus insulation was found “to be negative,” it also says.

On March 13, “Savage Pet became aware of an additional issue in New York of a kitten” he ate from tears 11.15.2026 and “Contracting the bird flu. Further testing is continuing.”

The company added, as the FDA site shows, “To ensure maximum security, we are modifying the withdrawal of our market in a withdrawal … Product with Lot Code/’The best from’ date 11.15.2026 was distributed in November 2024.”

“The boxes are cardboard and contain individual plastic packages inside. The Lot/Date ‘The Best’ Code is sealed at the bottom and in each package. “

Possible cat transmission to the cat

Previous studies have suggested that H5N1 can be broadcast between cats, and a March 15 statement from New York City Health Department seems to support that opportunity.

The statement provided details of two cats that contract the bird’s flu and a third cat allegedly having it.

“The bird flu virus (bird flu) was discovered in two cats and a third cat suspected over the past two months, all associated with wild cat feed, bird packages number 11152026,” read Alert.

The first cat, Cat A, became ill and died after eating chicken packages from Savage Cat Food.

“H5 bird flu test was performed at the Cornell Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, and H5N1 confirmation test from the National USDA veterinary laboratory (NVSL) is pending.”

A second cat, Cat B, was diagnosed with H5N1 and also died as a result of infection, health officials said – but “this cat did not consume the product of raw food, but was exposed to a sick cat, cat C. Cat C became feverish after consuming wild cat food number 11152026”.

“Cat C survived and the H5 testing failed and cannot be performed after a lot of time has passed.”

This suggests that Cat B may have been infected after contact with Cat C.